py2exe 的作者看来已经不想再继续维护py2exe，不知道会有什么变化，与py2app或setuptools结合。还是与pyinstaller结合。有兴趣的可以观注。

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Thomas Heller <theller at python.net>
Date: 2005-9-21 上午12:36
Subject: Getting tired with py2exe
To: py2exe-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: python-list at python.org, distutils-sig at python.org, python-win32 at python.org


I'm slowly getting tired maintaining py2exe.  It is far from perfect,
although it has interesting features (I would say).

The problem, apart from the work, is that it is good enough for me - I
can do everything that I need with it.  But I assume I use far less
libaries than other Python programmers, so a lot of bugs will never bite
me.

It is also interesting that the recently introduced bundle-files option,
which allows to build single-file exes has gained a lot of interest -
although the ONLY use case (so far) I have myself for it is to implement
inproc COM servers which will compatible with Python clients (and other
Python inproc COM servers) because of the total isolation of the Python
VMs.

Is anyone interested in taking over the maintainance, documentation, and
further development?

Should py2exe be integrated into another, larger, package?  Pywin32
comes to mind, but also Philip Eby's setuptools (that's why I post to
distutils-sig as well)...

Thomas

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


-- 
I like python! 
My Donews Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou

有需求肯定会有软件的，py2exe也不是要消失，而是寻求与其它软件模块的整合。我觉得这是个好事。
Python中的轮子就是太多了。
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.exoweb.net/pipermail/python-chinese/attachments/20050921/7b922461/attachment.htm

在 05-9-21，goopler<alang.yl at gmail.com> 写道：
> 有需求肯定会有软件的，py2exe也不是要消失，而是寻求与其它软件模块的整合。我觉得这是个好事。 
> Python中的轮子就是太多了。 

大家似乎对轮子很反感，但我认为这是创造性的一种表现。而且别的语言也并非没有新轮子在出现。不过从py2exe的变化倒与轮子关系不大。只不过这反映了个人项目的一种可能的变化：

在兴趣或动力消失后项目可能就会转移。一种可能与其它的"轮子"合并，另一种由其它人接替继续它"轮子"的生涯，再一种就是项目死亡。

-- 
I like python! 
My Donews Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou

我也不喜欢太多选择，会让人无所适从。一般1－3个就足够了。

在 05-9-21，limodou<limodou at gmail.com> 写道：
> 在 05-9-21，goopler<alang.yl at gmail.com> 写道：
> > 有需求肯定会有软件的，py2exe也不是要消失，而是寻求与其它软件模块的整合。我觉得这是个好事。
> > Python中的轮子就是太多了。
> 
> 大家似乎对轮子很反感，但我认为这是创造性的一种表现。而且别的语言也并非没有新轮子在出现。不过从py2exe的变化倒与轮子关系不大。只不过这反映了个人项目的一种可能的变化：
> 
> 在兴趣或动力消失后项目可能就会转移。一种可能与其它的"轮子"合并，另一种由其它人接替继续它"轮子"的生涯，再一种就是项目死亡。
> 
> --
> I like python!
> My Donews Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou
> 
> _______________________________________________
> python-chinese list
> python-chinese at lists.python.cn
> http://python.cn/mailman/listinfo/python-chinese
> 
> 
> 


-- 
我的blog：http://xlp223.yculblog.com