On 10/14/07, Zoom. Quiet <zoom.quiet在gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, HD <hdcola在gmail.com> wrote:
> > http://blog.opensource.org.cn/hdcola/2007/10/django-1.html
> >
> > 看来lighttpd+django+scgi是很牛B呀。 :)
> >
> 嗯嗯嗯,测试是永无止境的,设计了作业,回复你了,
> 咔咔咔^^
>
更加变态的发布方式没有对比哪:
Django benchmarks with Apache/mod_python and LiteSpeed/FastCGI
http://forum.webfaction.com/viewtopic.php?id=633

真正使用Django 投入运营没有裸奔的吧，类似
http://about.curse.com/technology/
的架构，加载这种 tip
http://www.jacobian.org/writing/2005/dec/12/django-performance-tips/
使用这种思路:
http://www.polimetrix.com/pycon/slides/

逐步完善才可用的说，这种终极情况时的对比?

> > --
> > HD（燃烧中的火）
> > 我工作我快乐，我勤奋我收获。请与我一起快乐，与我一起收获。
> >

-- 
'''Time is unimportant, only life important!
过程改进即是开始促生可以产生靠谱的人的组织!
'''http://zoomquiet.org
blog  @ http://blog.zoomquiet.org/pyblosxom/
wiki  @ http://wiki.woodpecker.org.cn/moin/ZoomQuiet
scrap @ http://floss.zoomquiet.org
share @ http://share.zoomquiet.org
douban@ http://www.douban.com/people/zoomq/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Pls. usage OOo to replace M$ Office. http://zh.openoffice.org
Pls. usage 7-zip to replace WinRAR/WinZip.  http://7-zip.org
You can get the truely Freedom 4 software.

fastcgi 和 scgi 都是用的 flup ?

我的 webpy 的 hello, world 测试里，flup 的fastcgi thread 和 prefork 性能是差不多的.

回头我也贴一个 benchmark 结果上来吧.

HD 的 prefork 测试结果不对吧

fastcgi 和 scgi 怎么都是
Complete requests: 5000
Failed requests: 5000
(Connect: 5000, Length: 0, Exceptions: 0)
Broken pipe errors: 0
Total transferred: 0 bytes
HTML transferred: 0 bytes

¿ÉÄܺÍosxÓйØϵ :(

2007/10/15, Yingbo Qiu <qiuyingbo在gmail.com>:
>
> fastcgi ºÍ scgi ¶¼ÊÇÓÃµÄ flup ?
>
> ÎÒµÄ webpy µÄ hello, world ²âÊÔÀflup µÄfastcgi thread ºÍ prefork ÐÔÄÜÊDz¶àµÄ.
>
> »ØÍ·ÎÒÒ²ÌùÒ»¸ö benchmark ½á¹ûÉÏÀ´°É.
> _______________________________________________
> python-chinese
> Post: send python-chinese在lists.python.cn
> Subscribe: send subscribe to python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to  python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Detail Info: http://python.cn/mailman/listinfo/python-chinese




-- 
HD£¨È¼ÉÕÖеĻð£©
ÎÒ¹¤×÷ÎÒ¿ìÀÖ£¬ÎÒÇÚ·ÜÎÒÊÕ»ñ¡£ÇëÓëÎÒÒ»Æð¿ìÀÖ£¬ÓëÎÒÒ»ÆðÊÕ»ñ¡£
-------------- 下一部分 --------------
Ò»¸öHTML¸½¼þ±»ÒƳý...
URL: http://python.cn/pipermail/python-chinese/attachments/20071015/7c1350a7/attachment.html 

¿ÉÄܺÍosxÓйØϵ :(

2007/10/15, Yingbo Qiu <qiuyingbo在gmail.com>:
>
> fastcgi ºÍ scgi ¶¼ÊÇÓÃµÄ flup ?
>
> ÎÒµÄ webpy µÄ hello, world ²âÊÔÀflup µÄfastcgi thread ºÍ prefork ÐÔÄÜÊDz¶àµÄ.
>
> »ØÍ·ÎÒÒ²ÌùÒ»¸ö benchmark ½á¹ûÉÏÀ´°É.
> _______________________________________________
> python-chinese
> Post: send python-chinese在lists.python.cn
> Subscribe: send subscribe to python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to  python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Detail Info: http://python.cn/mailman/listinfo/python-chinese




-- 
HD£¨È¼ÉÕÖеĻð£©
ÎÒ¹¤×÷ÎÒ¿ìÀÖ£¬ÎÒÇÚ·ÜÎÒÊÕ»ñ¡£ÇëÓëÎÒÒ»Æð¿ìÀÖ£¬ÓëÎÒÒ»ÆðÊÕ»ñ¡£
-------------- 下一部分 --------------
Ò»¸öHTML¸½¼þ±»ÒƳý...
URL: http://python.cn/pipermail/python-chinese/attachments/20071015/08dd3835/attachment.html 

½éÕæµÄÊÇabµÄ·´»ØÖµ£¬²âÊÔÁ˺ü¸´Î¶¼ÊÇÕâÑù¡£ :( Á÷Á¿²»¼ûÁË

2007/10/15, Yingbo Qiu <qiuyingbo在gmail.com>:
>
> HD µÄ prefork ²âÊÔ½á¹û²»¶Ô°É
>
> fastcgi ºÍ scgi Ôõô¶¼ÊÇ
> Complete requests: 5000
> Failed requests: 5000
> (Connect: 5000, Length: 0, Exceptions: 0)
> Broken pipe errors: 0
> Total transferred: 0 bytes
> HTML transferred: 0 bytes
> _______________________________________________
> python-chinese
> Post: send python-chinese在lists.python.cn
> Subscribe: send subscribe to python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to  python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Detail Info: http://python.cn/mailman/listinfo/python-chinese




-- 
HD£¨È¼ÉÕÖеĻð£©
ÎÒ¹¤×÷ÎÒ¿ìÀÖ£¬ÎÒÇÚ·ÜÎÒÊÕ»ñ¡£ÇëÓëÎÒÒ»Æð¿ìÀÖ£¬ÓëÎÒÒ»ÆðÊÕ»ñ¡£
-------------- 下一部分 --------------
Ò»¸öHTML¸½¼þ±»ÒƳý...
URL: http://python.cn/pipermail/python-chinese/attachments/20071015/4309641c/attachment.html 

那 prefork 模式下，你用浏览器直接访问结果呢？

 ¿ÉÒÔ·ÃÎÊ£¬Ã»ÓÐÎÊÌâ

2007/10/15, Yingbo Qiu <qiuyingbo在gmail.com>:
>
> ÄÇ prefork ģʽÏ£¬ÄãÓÃä¯ÀÀÆ÷Ö±½Ó·ÃÎʽá¹ûÄØ£¿
> _______________________________________________
> python-chinese
> Post: send python-chinese在lists.python.cn
> Subscribe: send subscribe to python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to  python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Detail Info: http://python.cn/mailman/listinfo/python-chinese




-- 
HD£¨È¼ÉÕÖеĻð£©
ÎÒ¹¤×÷ÎÒ¿ìÀÖ£¬ÎÒÇÚ·ÜÎÒÊÕ»ñ¡£ÇëÓëÎÒÒ»Æð¿ìÀÖ£¬ÓëÎÒÒ»ÆðÊÕ»ñ¡£
-------------- 下一部分 --------------
Ò»¸öHTML¸½¼þ±»ÒƳý...
URL: http://python.cn/pipermail/python-chinese/attachments/20071015/699212cd/attachment.htm 

古怪啊....

anyway, 在我以前的测试里面，prefork 在响应性上比 threadpool 要强一些；而且 apache 2.2 的
prefork 也比 worker 响应要快. 当然这是 Linux

ºÇºÇ£¬ÓпÕÁËÓ¦¸ÃʹÓò»Í¬µÄ²Ù×÷ϵͳ ÊÔÊÔ

ÔÚ07-10-16£¬Yingbo Qiu <qiuyingbo在gmail.com> дµÀ£º
>
> ¹Å¹Ö°¡....
>
> anyway, ÔÚÎÒÒÔÇ°µÄ²âÊÔÀïÃ棬prefork ÔÚÏìÓ¦ÐÔÉÏ±È threadpool ҪǿһЩ£»¶øÇÒ apache 2.2 µÄ
> prefork Ò²±È worker ÏìÓ¦Òª¿ì. µ±È»ÕâÊÇ Linux
> _______________________________________________
> python-chinese
> Post: send python-chinese在lists.python.cn
> Subscribe: send subscribe to python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to  python-chinese-request在lists.python.cn
> Detail Info: http://python.cn/mailman/listinfo/python-chinese




-- 
HD£¨È¼ÉÕÖеĻð£©
ÎÒ¹¤×÷ÎÒ¿ìÀÖ£¬ÎÒÇÚ·ÜÎÒÊÕ»ñ¡£ÇëÓëÎÒÒ»Æð¿ìÀÖ£¬ÓëÎÒÒ»ÆðÊÕ»ñ¡£
-------------- 下一部分 --------------
Ò»¸öHTML¸½¼þ±»ÒƳý...
URL: http://python.cn/pipermail/python-chinese/attachments/20071016/ad2b86c1/attachment.htm